Case 4113509/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Melvin v Not present Mrs N Nadeem Not Present Ms S Foley Not Present Ms K Murphy Not Present Mrs S Dunsmuir Not Present Greater Glasgow Health Board — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113509/2019
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claims in case 4113509/2019. The written judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, and it does not determine the merits of the underlying complaints.
Because the Tribunal declined jurisdiction, there was no award of compensation or other remedy. The judgment is a short disposal only, dated 28 February 2020 and entered in the register on 16 March 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the underlying heads of claim in the text itself; this claim type is inferred from the case listing. The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the underlying heads of claim in the text itself; this claim type is inferred from the case listing. The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.