Case 4113534/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Durrand v Reid and Fraser Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4113534/2021
- Decision date
- 23 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer
- Venue
- Wick
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Durrand
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Durrand brought claims for constructive unfair dismissal and unpaid holiday pay. The holiday pay issue fell away during the evidence because the claimant accepted that he had taken all of his accrued holiday. He then withdrew that claim, and the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal.
On the dismissal claim, the tribunal accepted that the claimant resigned in response to two matters: the timing of notice about the sale of shares in the respondent and an alleged promised pay rise arising from a September 2016 appraisal. The tribunal found that the 2016 discussion did not create an express promise to give a particular pay rise; at most, the respondent agreed to look at pay again, and in fact the claimant received later increases in 2016, 2018 and 2021. There was therefore no breach of contract in relation to pay.
The tribunal also found no basis for implying a term requiring the respondent to tell employees about a share sale in advance, or to give a particular period of notice of it. The sale of shares was treated as a matter for the shareholders and purchasers, and the tribunal held that the employee terms and conditions did not change as a result of the share transfer into the employee ownership trust. On that basis, the tribunal rejected the allegation that the timing of the announcement breached the implied term of trust and confidence.
The tribunal further held that the claimant’s resignation was undermined by his 29 October 2021 email saying he would return if the respondent offered £15 per hour, a four-day week and 36 hours per week. That email was treated as inconsistent with a case that trust and confidence had been destroyed. The constructive unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unauthorised deductions from pay in relation to holiday pay. The claimant confirmed during evidence that he had taken all accrued holiday, then withdrew the claim; the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Claim pleaded as constructive unfair dismissal based on alleged lack of notice of the share sale and failure to grant a promised pay rise. The tribunal found no express or implied term requiring notice of the share sale or a particular pay rise, no breach of trust and confidence, and no constructive dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- Malik v BCCI implied term of trust and confidence
- RDF Media Group plc and anor v Clements
- Hilton v Shiner Ltd — Builders Merchants
- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Meikle v Nottinghamshire County Council
- Bournemouth University Higher Education Corporation v Buckland
- Kaur guidance on constructive dismissal
- Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd
- Shirlaw v Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd
- officious bystander test
- business efficacy test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.