Case 4113539/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Smyth v Ixia Flowers Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4113539/2021
- Decision date
- 3 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Smyth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Smyth appeared in person; the respondent did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal determined the matter on the papers and oral hearing held via Cloud Video Platform on 1 March 2022.
The claimant’s breach of contract claim succeeded in respect of wages due on 26 November 2021. The tribunal assessed damages for that claim at £1,944.24. It also upheld the claimant’s claim under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for accrued but untaken annual leave, awarding £680.40 gross.
The tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to order the respondent to issue payslips or a P45, and those claims were dismissed. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £2,624.64.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded in respect of wages due on 26 November 2021; damages were assessed at £1,944.24. | Upheld | — | £1,944 |
| Working time regulations | Claim under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded in respect of accrued but untaken annual leave; compensation was awarded in the gross sum of £680.40. | Upheld | — | £680 |
| Other | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to order the respondent to issue payslips or a P45, so those claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,625
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.