Case 4113570/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113570/2019 Miss N Beg v Cashmere And Tartan Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113570/2019
- Decision date
- 22 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Claire McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113570/2019 Miss N Beg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so Employment Judge Claire McManus issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 4 March 2020 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of GBP 1,076.89 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered a further GBP 1,293.60 gross.
The judgment permitted the respondent to deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions before payment. It records the claimant's understanding that the appropriate deductions totalled GBP 263.89 for PAYE tax and GBP 198.12 for National Insurance contributions, after which payment of the balance would satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 default judgment: the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay GBP 1,076.89 gross, subject to lawful deductions for tax and employee National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,077 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 default judgment: the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay GBP 1,293.60 gross, subject to lawful deductions for tax and employee National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,294 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,370
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.