Case 4113633/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v 12621656 Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4113633/2021
- Decision date
- 13 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge determined the matter on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £671.59.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,431.85. Those two awards together produced a total award of £2,103.44.
The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear a claim for unlawful deduction of wages in relation to pension contributions. It also said that the application for preparation costs could not be considered because there were no grounds for a costs order under rule 76, and the hearing listed for 17 February 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £672 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,432 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear a claim for unlawful deduction of wages in relation to pension contributions. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,103
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.