Case 4113707/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Wendy Kerr v Teleperformance limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4113707/2021
- Decision date
- 22 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Wendy Kerr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought monetary claims concerning alleged unpaid wages and holiday pay across September to December 2021. The tribunal found that she was employed on written terms, was paid monthly, and that her contract permitted the respondent to deduct overpayments or money owed. The tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence about the payroll adjustment period and how absences after the monthly cut-off were corrected in later payslips.
For September and November holiday pay, the tribunal found that the claimant had been paid for the annual leave she took, including 22 and 23 September and 1 to 5 November. It also found that she had been paid for 24 September when she worked, and that the October deductions were accounted for by sickness absence and authorised unpaid absence rather than by non-payment for those dates.
On the wages claims, the tribunal found that the October deduction of about £400.94 reflected recovery of wages already paid for September sickness absence when the claimant was only entitled to SSP, and was authorised by the contract. It found the agreed five days' compassionate leave had been paid. It also found there was no agreement or contractual entitlement to full pay during the claimant's October and November sickness absence, and that the claimant had not proved unpaid wages for December during her phased return. The claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal considered alleged non-payment of wages or agreed pay in September, October, November and December 2021, including the October deduction, bereavement allowance, full pay during sickness absence, and pay on return to work. | Dismissed | — | £0 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal considered alleged non-payment of holiday pay for 22 and 23 September 2021 and 1 to 5 November 2021 under Regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Dismissed | — | £0 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 16 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.