Case 4113735/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4113735/2021 & others as per multiple ref 4100138Ms M Forteath & others as per attached schedule Forth Care Limited (in Liquidation) v Represented by: Mr P Kissen - Solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 4113735/2021
- Decision date
- 14 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4113735/2021 & others as per multiple ref 4100138Ms M Forteath & others as per attached schedule Forth Care Limited (in Liquidation)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form was sent to the respondent on 21 December 2021 and the respondent did not enter a response within the required time. The Employment Judge recorded that on 16 May 2022 the respondent was placed into creditors’ voluntary liquidation and that the joint liquidators had indicated they did not intend to enter the proceedings. The judgment also states that there were no funds in the liquidation to satisfy the claims.
On the material available, the Employment Judge determined the case without a hearing as to liability under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal, a protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, redundancy pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay, and notice pay all succeeded.
The judgment did not determine remedy. It states that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined by an Employment Judge at a hearing if required.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this claim as arrears of pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this claim as notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.