Case 4113747/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Andrew Udy v Opulent Catering Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4113747/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Bradley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Andrew Udy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAndrew Udy worked for Opulent Catering Limited from about 7 August 2019 as an office administrator on an annual salary of £16,500 and a 37.5-hour week. The tribunal found that he was absent for two days in September 2019 because of illness and that on or about 30 September 2019 he was dismissed with immediate effect by Mr Valante, with lateness given as the reason at the time. The hearing proceeded in the respondent's absence after attempts to contact it failed and Companies House records suggested strike-off proceedings had been underway.
On the wages claim, the tribunal accepted that two days' pay should be deducted for illness at a daily rate based on 1/365 of salary, and that the claimant had agreed that payment was net rather than gross and that a £100 cash advance could be deducted. It rejected the respondent's method of reducing pay by reference to its own calculation of hours worked in the month, because the unsigned contract did not authorise that approach and the respondent had not shown that its September hours calculation was accurate. On that basis, the gross pay due was found to be £1,284.59, with deductions for tax and NIC leading to net pay due of £1,123.12, leaving £190.12 outstanding after the £933 already paid.
The second part of the claim was treated as a contractual damages claim for one week's notice pay. The tribunal accepted the claimant's revised weekly gross pay figure of £317.31 and applied the same tax and NIC rates to reach net damages of £302.16. Both parts of the claim therefore succeeded, but in lower amounts than originally sought. The judgment ordered payment of £190.12 for the wages deduction and £302.16 for breach of contract, making a total award of £492.28.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint under section 13 ERA 1996 succeeded. The tribunal found £190.12 remained due after allowing two days' sickness absence, tax and NIC deductions, and a £100 cash advance. | Upheld | — | £190 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for one week's notice pay following summary termination on 30 September 2019. The tribunal awarded net damages of £302.16. | Upheld | — | £302 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £492
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 23(1)(a) ERA 1996
- section 24(1)(a) ERA 1996
- Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.