Case 4113763/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Mclanachan v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 4113763/2021
- Decision date
- 24 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
- Venue
- GlasgowOn
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss A Mclanachan
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant did not attend the final hearing on 24 March 2022.
It found that, in light of her failure to attend and it being apparent that she did not intend to pursue the case, the claim was dismissed. The judgment does not contain any substantive determination of the underlying pleaded claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing and appeared not to intend to pursue it. The judgment does not distinguish separately between the listed heads of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing and appeared not to intend to pursue it. The judgment does not distinguish separately between the listed heads of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing and appeared not to intend to pursue it. The judgment does not distinguish separately between the listed heads of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.