Case 4113764/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Barry McCrindle v Represented by: Ms M Gribbon - Solicitor The Secretary of State for Business, Energy — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113764/2019
- Decision date
- 28 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Barry McCrindle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined on agreed facts and written submissions. Mr Barry McCrindle had obtained an earlier Employment Tribunal award including a basic award of £4,785 for unfair dismissal. After his former employer became insolvent and a liquidator was appointed on 4 February 2019, he sought payment from the Secretary of State under the insolvency provisions of the ERA 1996. The respondent paid £3,656.02 and deducted £1,128.98 for tax and national insurance, which was the only issue in dispute.
The tribunal set out the relevant provisions of Part XII of the ERA 1996, including s.184(1)(d), and the taxation provisions in ITEPA 2003, including ss.401 to 403. It accepted that a basic award is not earnings derived from employment and is not a payment to which the limited statutory redundancy exemptions in s.309 of ITEPA 2003 directly apply. The tribunal considered instead whether the basic award was a payment received directly or indirectly in consequence of or otherwise in connection with the termination of employment within s.401 ITEPA 2003, with the £30,000 threshold in s.403.
The tribunal found that the basic award fell within s.401 because it was an amount paid in connection with termination of employment, and that it was not a sum related to or derived from earnings or income. It concluded that, where an employer has become insolvent and the Secretary of State pays a basic award ordered by the Employment Tribunal, the payment must be made without deduction of tax and national insurance. The claim therefore succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the deducted sum of £1,128.98.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim concerned whether the respondent was entitled to deduct tax and national insurance from the basic award paid under the insolvency provisions of the ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,129 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,129
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- Part XII ERA 1996
- s.184 ERA 1996
- s.401 ITEPA 2003
- s.403 ITEPA 2003
- Du Cros v Ryall (1935) 19 TC 444
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.