Case 4113772/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Martyn Campbell v McGill & Co Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113772/2019
- Decision date
- 16 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Martyn Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint that McGill & Co Ltd (in Administration) had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 in relation to collective redundancies. The respondent did not lodge a response, did not appear, and the case was heard on the claimant's evidence and limited productions. The tribunal found that the complaint was within its jurisdiction because the issue was whether late presentation could be excused under section 189(5).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 concerning failure to consult about collective redundancies; the tribunal made a protective award under section 189 for a protected period of 90 days from 5 February 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Limited [1974] ICR 53
- Suzy Radin Limited v GMB and others [2004] IRLR 400
- section 188 TULR(C)A 1992
- section 189 TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.