Case 4113803/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113803/2021 Mr C Wilson v F&F (2016) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4113803/2021
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113803/2021 Mr C Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £198.
The tribunal also recorded that it had no jurisdiction to make an order for production of payslips. It found that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of initial employment particulars in accordance with section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £628, described as two weeks' pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted text reads "£1 98."; treated here as £198. | Upheld | — | £198 |
| Other | The judgment states that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to order production of payslips, but it found a failure to provide a statement of initial employment particulars under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £628 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £826
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.