Case 4113804/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113804/2019 Miss S Yates v Bacco Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113804/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113804/2019 Miss S Yates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge Laura Doherty found that Miss S Yates had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal therefore awarded damages of £741 for the notice claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £389. In addition, the claimant succeeded in her unfair dismissal claim, and the tribunal awarded a monetary award of £4,328. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning, legal tests, or apportionment beyond those stated awards.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards £741 damages. | Upheld | — | £741 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awards £389. | Upheld | — | £389 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awards a monetary award of £4,328. | Upheld | — | £4,328 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,458
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,328
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.