Case 4113809/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113809/2021 Mrs D Ewins v OVO (S) Metering Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4113809/2021
- Decision date
- 15 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113809/2021 Mrs D Ewins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because the respondent presented no response. The Tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages in the sum of £124.13 and ordered payment of that amount to Mrs D Ewins.
The Tribunal also recorded that it did not have jurisdiction to make an award for stress, mental distress, or inconvenience in this case. The hearing listed for 16 March 2022 was cancelled. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge M Robison on 11 February 2022 and entered in the register on 15 February 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: no response was presented. The Tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £124.13. It also stated it had no jurisdiction to make an award for stress, mental distress, or inconvenience. | Upheld | — | £124 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £124
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.