Case 4113816/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Ritchie v Represented by: In Person Aberness Care Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113816/2019
- Decision date
- 8 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hosie
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Ritchie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 25 June 2020 the Tribunal gave Miss Ritchie an opportunity to provide written reasons by 2 July 2020, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that she did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Hosie therefore struck out the claim under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated grounds were non-compliance with an Order of the Tribunal under Rule 37(1)(c) and that the claim had not been actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d).
The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the merits of the underlying employment complaint, and no monetary award was made. The decision was dated 7 July 2020 and sent to the parties on 8 July 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out under Rule 37 on the grounds of non-compliance with a Tribunal Order and failure actively to pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 37(1)(c)
- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.