Case 4113818/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4113818/2019 Miss C Allan v Glasgow City Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 4113818/2019
- Decision date
- 6 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4113818/2019 Miss C Allan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant's solicitors had withdrawn and that a strike out warning letter was sent after the claimant failed to reply to a status enquiry asking her to confirm her intention regarding the claim.
The correspondence was returned to the Tribunal Office indicating that the claimant no longer lived at the address provided on the ET1. The claimant had not provided a new address, so the Tribunal could not communicate with her or give notice under rule 37(2). In those circumstances, the Tribunal assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out under rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment does not set out the substance of the claim beyond striking out the claim for not being actively pursued; the equal pay classification follows the listing category/context rather than detailed reasons in the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.