Case 4113833/2021 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113833/2021 Held at Aberdeen on & September 2022 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr S Craig v Represented by Ms L Beedie, First Employment Law Ainscough Crane Hire Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4113833/2021
- Decision date
- 7 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113833/2021 Held at Aberdeen on & September 2022 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr S Craig
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Aberdeen on 20 and 21 September 2022 before Employment Judge J M Hendry. The claimant was Mr S Craig and the respondent was Ainscough Crane Hire Ltd. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing on 21 September 2022.
The tribunal held that the claimant's application for a finding of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. That claim was dismissed. The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings or legal analysis in the written text provided, only the final outcome announced orally at the hearing.
The judgment is limited to that disposal and does not record any monetary award, split remedy, or separate determination on other claims in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's application for a finding of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.