Case 4113840/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113840/2019 Mr S Lamb v Airdrie & Monklands ASC — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113840/2019
- Decision date
- 10 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113840/2019 Mr S Lamb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The reasons record that the claimant failed to attend a preliminary hearing on 17 March 2020 and then failed to explain that non-attendance by 27 March 2020.
The Tribunal later gave the claimant another opportunity on 8 June 2020 to provide written reasons by 15 June 2020 or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the Tribunal struck out the claim. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment itself refers only to 'the claim'; the underlying claim type is classified from the case listing as unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.