Case 4113855/2019 · Employment Tribunal
: Mr R McPherson Mr A McFarlane Mr G Reid v ’s Mother Brakes Bros Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4113855/2019
- Decision date
- 18 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Members
- Venue
- Glasgow
- Panel members
- Mr R McPherson, Mr A McFarlane
Parties
2 namedClaimant
: Mr R McPherson Mr A McFarlane Mr G Reid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sat in Glasgow and heard the case over 11 to 14 October 2021. The judgment records that the panel was chaired by Employment Judge M Kearns, with lay members Mr R McPherson and Mr A McFarlane, and that the claimant was Mr G Reid, represented by his mother, Mrs Reid, against Brakes Bros Limited, represented by Mr D Hay Advocate.
The tribunal states that its unanimous judgment, delivered orally with reasons on 14 October 2021, was to dismiss the claims. On the face of the extracted judgment text, the claims before the tribunal included unfair dismissal and disability discrimination, and both were dismissed.
No separate remedy award, liability breakdown, or detailed findings of fact are set out in the extracted text provided. The judgment therefore records only the overall dismissal outcome and the date on which judgment was entered, 18 October 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.