Case 4113861/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113861/2019 Hearing held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on September 20205 Employment Judge M A Macleod Mr A Tasker v Represented by:10 Mrs A Tasker - Mother Duncan Adams Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113861/2019
- Decision date
- 22 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113861/2019 Hearing held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on September 20205 Employment Judge M A Macleod Mr A Tasker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with a preliminary hearing on 14 September 2020. The respondent did not attend or present a response. The issues were whether the tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the claim, given that it was lodged out of time, and whether the claimant was entitled to a protective award arising from the respondent's redundancy consultation failure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under s.189 TULR(C)A 1992; the tribunal held it had jurisdiction despite late presentation and awarded the maximum 90 days' pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.189(5) TULR(C)A 1992
- reasonably practicable
- such further time as the Tribunal considers reasonable
- s.189(1)(d) TULR(C)A 1992
- s.189(3) TULR(C)A 1992
- s.189(4) TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.