Case 4113985/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Lookers plc and Lomond Motors Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113985/2019
- Decision date
- 2 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing held remotely at Glasgow on 31 August 2020 before Employment Judge Hoey. The judgment records that the claims against the second respondent, Lomond Motors Ltd, had been withdrawn at the hearing and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The effect of the order was that the second respondent was released from the proceedings, and the claims were to continue against the first respondent, Lookers plc, only. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability on the merits, and it does not contain any financial award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claims as against the second respondent were withdrawn at the preliminary hearing on 31 August 2020 and dismissed under Rule 52. The second respondent was released from the proceedings and the claims were to proceed against the first respondent only. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claims as against the second respondent were withdrawn at the preliminary hearing on 31 August 2020 and dismissed under Rule 52. The second respondent was released from the proceedings and the claims were to proceed against the first respondent only. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.