Case 4114004/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114004/2019 Mr M Saifee v BD 1971 Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4114004/2019
- Decision date
- 17 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Susan Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114004/2019 Mr M Saifee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim on the available material under rule 21 because no response had been presented. Employment Judge Susan Walker issued judgment on 15 February 2020, later entered in the register on 17 February 2020. The hearing listed for 20 March 2020 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages, had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and was in breach of contract by not paying a service charge. Each of those claims succeeded.
The tribunal ordered payment of £1,882.52 for the wages claim, £99 for the holiday entitlement claim, and £119 as damages for the breach of contract claim. The judgment does not record any separate award of interest or any broader remedy beyond those sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,882.52. | Upheld | — | £1,883 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £99. | Upheld | — | £99 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract for non-payment of a service charge and awarded £119 as damages. | Upheld | — | £119 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,101
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.