Case 4114232/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4114232/2019 Mrs F Pastuszko v Thomas Cook — 2021
- Case reference
- 4114232/2019
- Decision date
- 18 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4114232/2019 Mrs F Pastuszko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claim was submitted on 10 December 2019. By letter dated 19 December 2019, the Tribunal advised the claimant that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and that permission to proceed had to be sought from the court dealing with the liquidation proceedings.
The Tribunal later sought an update from the claimant on 25 August 2020 about obtaining consent to proceed, but no reply was received. On 28 June 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 12 July 2021 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why strike-out judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal struck out the claim on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive type of claim; it states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.