Case 4114302/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Cameron v East Ayrshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4114302/2014
- Decision date
- 16 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- COET Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Cameron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
After the claimant's solicitor withdrew from acting, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant seeking his intentions for the future conduct of the proceedings and later sent a reminder. The claimant did not respond. On 31 May 2017, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 14 June 2017 to provide written reasons or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason or request a hearing, and the claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing category indicates Working Time Regulations. The judgment itself does not describe the substantive claim beyond stating that the claim is struck out under rule 37 because it has not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.