Case 4114413/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Grant v Aramark US Offshore Services LLC — 2017
- Case reference
- 4114413/2014
- Decision date
- 21 September 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Grant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that, after the claimant's solicitor withdrew from acting, it wrote to the claimant seeking her intentions about the future conduct of the proceedings. No response was received, and no response was received after a reminder was sent.
On 23 August 2017, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 6 September 2017 to provide written reasons or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason or request a hearing, so the Tribunal struck out the claim on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The working_time classification follows the supplied gov.uk listing category rather than detailed reasons in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.