Case 4114435/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Silva v Aramark US Offshore Services LLC — 2017
- Case reference
- 4114435/2014
- Decision date
- 20 September 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Silva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAfter the claimant's solicitor withdrew from acting, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant asking for his intentions about the future conduct of the proceedings. The claimant did not respond, and did not respond to a reminder.
On 23 August 2017, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 6 September 2017 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing on that issue. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not describe the substantive working time issue; classification follows the supplied listing category and hint. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.