Case 4114560/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4114560/2019 Mr J McDonald v Glasgow Life — 2023
- Case reference
- 4114560/2019
- Decision date
- 13 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4114560/2019 Mr J McDonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, on 15 June 2023, it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 6 July 2023 or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s), and the only issue determined was whether the case should remain in force.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why a strike-out should not be made and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Frances Eccles struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, relying on rule 37(1)(d) because the claim had not been actively pursued. No monetary remedy was awarded or discussed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive head(s) of claim; it records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.