Case 4114678/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114678/2019 Miss C Brown v Harry’s Bakery Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4114678/2019
- Decision date
- 4 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114678/2019 Miss C Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claim form was sent to the respondent on 27 December 2019 and that the respondent failed to enter a response by 24 January 2020 or at all. On that basis, the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made on the available material without a hearing as to liability, but not as to remedy.
The judgment states that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, failure to pay redundancy pay, breach of contract by failure to pay notice pay, and failure to pay holiday pay all succeed. No further findings on the underlying facts are given in the judgment, and the amount of any award was left to be determined at a later hearing before an Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Succeeded on the Rule 21 default judgment; liability determined without a hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Failure to pay redundancy pay succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim was for breach of contract by failure to pay notice pay; it succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday pay succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 16 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.