Case 4114682/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114682/2019 Mr A Connelly v Harry’s Bakery Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4114682/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mel Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114682/2019 Mr A Connelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and the respondent was ordered to pay damages of £1,182.24.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was therefore entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,773.36. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £394.08.
The judgment is dated 19 February 2020 and was entered in the register on 24 February 2020. The total monetary award reflected in the three orders is £3,349.68.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,182.24. | Upheld | — | £1,182 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,773.36. | Upheld | — | £1,773 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £394.08. | Upheld | — | £394 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,350
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.