Case 4114685/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114685/2019 Mrs M Crow v Harry’s Bakery Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4114685/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mel Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114685/2019 Mrs M Crow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented, so the Employment Judge decided the case on the available material. The tribunal found that Mrs M Crow was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Harry’s Bakery Ltd to pay damages of £862.05.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,293.00. The judgment does not record any further findings on liability, and it does not separate the awards beyond the two amounts stated in the decision. The total monetary outcome recorded by the judgment is £2,155.05.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages in this sum. | Upheld | — | £862 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment in this sum. | Upheld | — | £1,293 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,155
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.