Case 4114725/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114725/2019 Miss S Jarvie v Harry’s Bakery Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4114725/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mel Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114725/2019 Miss S Jarvie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Mel Sangster issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that Miss S Jarvie had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Harry's Bakery Ltd to pay damages of £2,980.23.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The extracted text records the redundancy sum as '£3.251.16'; this has been read as £3,251.16 for the structured record.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £270.93. The awards in the judgment sum to £6,502.32.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment awards damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,980 |
| Redundancy | The extracted text reads '£3.251.16'; this has been interpreted as £3,251.16 for the structured amount. | Upheld | — | £3,251 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £271 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,502
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.