Case 4114747/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4114747/2019 Mrs J Rafferty v Thomas Cook — 2021
- Case reference
- 4114747/2019
- Decision date
- 18 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4114747/2019 Mrs J Rafferty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The claim had been submitted on 19 December 2019. The Tribunal told the claimant on 27 December 2019 that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and that permission to proceed had to be sought from the court dealing with the liquidation proceedings. The Tribunal later sought an update on 27 August 2020 but received no reply.
On 28 June 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 12 July 2021, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason or request a hearing, and the Tribunal struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim or claims beyond referring to 'the claim'; it was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.