Case 4114987/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Erlank v Argyll & Bute Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 4114987/2019
- Decision date
- 30 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Cowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Erlank
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed for some other substantial reason, described by the respondent as a breakdown in working relationships. The tribunal accepted that the dismissing manager genuinely believed there was a breakdown between the claimant and her manager and that this was a potentially fair reason for dismissal.
The tribunal found the dismissal unfair because the respondent had not handled the breakdown in a fair and reasonable way. It found that earlier opportunities to resolve the relationship difficulties were missed, alternative working arrangements were not actively pursued, the claimant was not kept informed about changes to the proposed facilitated discussion process, and no up-to-date Occupational Health or GP evidence was obtained about whether she could reasonably participate in the proposed one-day mediation format.
The tribunal held that the appeal did not remedy those defects. It made no Polkey reduction, finding it could not be said that dismissal would have occurred in any event, but reduced compensation by 20% for the claimant's contributory role in the dismissal. The separate wages claim about extended sick pay failed because the claimant had not proved entitlement to that discretionary payment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim. It found a potentially fair reason of some other substantial reason, namely breakdown in working relationships, but held the dismissal was unfair under s.98(4) ERA 1996. Award was reduced by 20% for contributory conduct. | Upheld | — | £26,574 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant challenged the decision not to extend sick pay. The tribunal held she had not proved entitlement to the discretionary payment, so the claim could not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,574
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,997
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £21,576
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.98(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- band of reasonable responses
- Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust
- Turner v Vestric Ltd
- Phoenix House Ltd v Stockman
- Boys and Girls Welfare Society v McDonald
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.