Case 4115032/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Murphy v Honeywell Control Systems Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4115032/2014
- Decision date
- 20 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- COET Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Murphy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that, after the claimant's solicitor withdrew from acting, it wrote to the claimant seeking his intentions about the future conduct of the proceedings. No response was received, and a reminder also produced no response.
On 30 May 2017, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 13 June 2017 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing to consider that question. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out under rule 37 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment itself does not describe the substantive Working Time Regulations issue; classification follows the supplied gov.uk listing category. The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.