Case 4115115/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4115115/2014 Mr D Wilson v Devro (Scotland) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4115115/2014
- Decision date
- 27 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4115115/2014 Mr D Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr D Wilson brought a claim against Devro (Scotland) Limited. It does not set out the factual background or the specific working time issue, but the gov.uk listing categorises the case under Working Time Regulations.
Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy was awarded or addressed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim, having been withdrawn by the claimant, was dismissed under Rule 52. The claim type is identified from the gov.uk Working Time Regulations listing; the judgment text itself does not describe the claim particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.