Case 4115475/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4115475/2014 Miss K Armstrong v West Lothian Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 4115475/2014
- Decision date
- 19 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4115475/2014 Miss K Armstrong
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Rules in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal recorded that on 22 February 2021 the claimant was given until 8 March 2021 to provide written reasons, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing, so the Tribunal struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The gov.uk listing categories indicate unlawful deduction from wages and working time, but the judgment text only states that the claim is struck out under rule 37 because it has not been actively pursued. The specific underlying claim or claims are not identified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.