Case 4116463/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4116463/2018 Mr J Wood v Clancy Docwra Ltd Clancy Docwra rd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4116463/2018
- Decision date
- 4 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4116463/2018 Mr J Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claims against the first and third respondents, Clancy Group PLC and Clancy Docwra Ltd, had been withdrawn by the claimant. It therefore dismissed those claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the underlying unfair dismissal or disability discrimination allegations and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim against the first and third respondents had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. No merits findings are stated. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim against the first and third respondents had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. No merits findings are stated. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.