Case 4116482/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4116482/2018 Mr D Kerr v The Scottish Ministers — 2018
- Case reference
- 4116482/2018
- Decision date
- 8 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4116482/2018 Mr D Kerr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. It was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
No findings on liability, factual issues, or remedy are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. The gov.uk listing categories indicate Unfair Dismissal and Disability Discrimination, but the judgment itself does not separately identify adjudicated claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. Disability discrimination is inferred from the listing category, not from separate reasoning in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.