Case 4116742/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Mrs R Milne v Represented by: Mr F Lefevre and Mr D Burnside Solicitors Buchan Dial A Community Bus — 2019
- Case reference
- 4116742/2018
- Decision date
- 10 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Mrs R Milne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Milne had been employed by Buchan Dial a Community Bus since 2000 and was General Manager when she was dismissed in May 2018. The dismissal arose from an investigation into a 10,000 transfer to the related entity DAB Plus, overtime and time off in lieu, and a GDPR procurement decision. The tribunal found that conduct was the reason for dismissal, but that the investigation and disciplinary process were materially flawed, including inaccurate findings about the date of the payment and the failure to take statements from two people present at the key meeting on 14 March 2018.
On the £10,000 payment, the tribunal accepted the evidence of Ms van den Akker and Mr Milne that the meeting on 14 March 2018 had agreed the proposal for a management fee, so Mrs Milne had at least a reasonable basis for instructing the transfer. Although the tribunal noted technical issues under the Articles of Association, it held that no reasonable employer would have concluded that this issue amounted to gross misconduct or justified summary dismissal. It reached the same conclusion on the overtime, TOIL and procurement matters: there had been poor communication and irregular management, but not conduct that made dismissal a reasonable response.
The tribunal held that the appeal did not cure the defects in the original process and that no Polkey reduction was appropriate because dismissal itself was not within the range of reasonable responses. It found that Mrs Milne had contributed to her dismissal to the extent of 60%, mainly by acting without following agreed instructions, authorising her own overtime, and handling TOIL and procurement too loosely. The unfair dismissal award was therefore reduced to 8,299.77, consisting of a basic award of 4,470.40 and a compensatory award of 3,829.37.
On the notice pay claim, the tribunal held that the respondent had not proved repudiatory breach by Mrs Milne. It awarded 12 weeks' notice pay of 6,776.76 as damages for breach of contract. The total award across both claims was 15,076.53.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair under s.98(4) ERA 1996 and reduced the unfair dismissal award by 60% for contributory conduct. | Upheld | — | £8,300 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimant had not repudiated the contract and awarded 12 weeks' notice pay as damages for wrongful dismissal / breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £6,777 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,077
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,470
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,829
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
13 references- s.98(1) and (2) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Burchell test
- Iceland Frozen Foods band of reasonable responses
- Polkey principle
- s.119 ERA 1996
- s.122(2) ERA 1996
- s.123(4) ERA 1996
- s.123(6) ERA 1996
- Nelson v BBC (No. 2)
- Hollier v Plysu Ltd
- Devis v Atkins
- Britto-Babapulle v Ealing Hospital NHS Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.