Case 4116782/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4116782/2018 Mr S Struthers v Represented by: Ms A Bowman – Solicitor Stork Technical Services UK Limited st and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 4116782/2018
- Decision date
- 20 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4116782/2018 Mr S Struthers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the claim was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive nature of the claim beyond the case title and the parties. No findings on liability, remedy, or compensation are recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the substantive cause of action. It states only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.