Case 4117027/2018 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4117027/2018 Mr G Brown v Represented by: Mr R Russell Solicitor British Telecommunications plc — 2019
- Case reference
- 4117027/2018
- Decision date
- 6 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4117027/2018 Mr G Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order and does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute. It identifies the case as Mr G Brown v British Telecommunications PLC and records representation for both parties.
The only operative finding is that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge Nicol Hosie ordered that the claim be dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No hearing evidence, liability findings, or remedy assessment are recorded in the judgment.
The order is dated 6 February 2019 and was entered in the register and copied to the parties on the same date. The judgment does not separate the claim into individual causes of action, and it does not record any award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.