Case 4117160/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4117160/2018 & 4104630/2019 Mrs M Doogan v Glasgow City Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 4117160/2018
- Decision date
- 14 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4117160/2018 & 4104630/2019 Mrs M Doogan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, and the tribunal wrote to the claimant on 4 April 2024 seeking confirmation of her intentions regarding the claim.
The correspondence was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address provided on the ET1. The claimant had not informed the tribunal of a new address, so the tribunal could not communicate with her or give notice under rule 37(2). In those circumstances, the tribunal assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out under rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued but does not identify the substantive cause or causes of action in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.