Case 4117161/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4117161/2018 & 4104359/2019 Ms E Dunn v Glasgow City Council Cordia Services LLP — 2024
- Case reference
- 4117161/2018
- Decision date
- 12 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4117161/2018 & 4104359/2019 Ms E Dunn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a procedural judgment only. On 3 June 2024, the tribunal gave Ms Dunn an opportunity to provide written reasons by 24 June 2024, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason for why a strike-out order should not be made and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute are recorded in this judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s) in the extracted text. The case was struck out for not having been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.