Case 4117206/2018 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4117206/2018 & others per attached schedule Mr GJ Dennaird v Per attached schedule Mr D Hutchison Solicitor Lambert Contracts Limited (In Administration) — 2018
- Case reference
- 4117206/2018
- Decision date
- 5 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4117206/2018 & others per attached schedule Mr GJ Dennaird
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claims. The respondent was in administration, and the joint administrator confirmed by letter dated 9 October 2018 that he did not object to the claims continuing and did not intend to defend them. The Employment Judge therefore issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the complaint under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 well founded and directed that a protective award be made. The judgment states that the protected period should be 90 days beginning on 1 June 2018, but no monetary sum is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.