Case 4117252/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Ms D Rose v Paula Deans — 2018
- Case reference
- 4117252/2018
- Decision date
- 21 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Ms D Rose
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs D Rose brought a claim for arrears of wages after the termination of her employment with Paula Deans. The respondent denied the claim but did not attend the hearing. The tribunal proceeded in her absence and accepted the claimant's oral evidence, her diary records, and the rota photographs and associated documents that she had produced.
The tribunal found that the claimant started work on or about 16 April 2018 at the Arbroath Artisan Golf Club Restaurant. It accepted the working arrangement as pleaded by the claimant, including payment at National Minimum Wage rates with flexible hours and an agreed basis of 23 hours per week, later paid in cash monthly. On the evidence accepted by the tribunal, the claimant had worked 361.75 hours and been paid for only 230 hours. After allowing for later payments, and adding holiday pay accrued but untaken, the balance due was calculated at 34.25 hours, producing an award of £268.17.
The tribunal also accepted that the claimant had incurred £33.26 in reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for two recorded-delivery letters and for printing and copying the rota photographs and documents used to support the claim. Separately, it found that the respondent had acted unreasonably in the way she dealt with the proceedings by failing to engage with the claim or provide any counter-calculation, so a Preparation Time Order was made for two hours at £33 per hour, totalling £66. The total sum payable was therefore £367.43.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent unlawfully withheld wages and holiday pay in the sum of £268.17 under section 24(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The separate £33.26 award under section 24(2) and the £66 preparation time order were made in addition to this claim award. | Upheld | — | £268 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £367
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.24(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 76(1) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rules 74-84 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- s.75(2) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.