Case 4117259/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4117259/2018 Mr R Taylor st v Represented by: Ms A Bowman – Solicitor Wood Group UK Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4117259/2018
- Decision date
- 24 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4117259/2018 Mr R Taylor st
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Aberdeen, Employment Judge Nicol Hosie recorded that the claims brought by Mr R Taylor, Mr A Rogerson and Mr D McKenzie against Wood Group UK Limited had been withdrawn by the claimants. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Because the claims were withdrawn, the judgment contains no merits findings and no monetary award or other remedy. The decision is dated 21 December 2018 and was entered in the register on 24 December 2018.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. The extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; the case context lists the matter as unfair dismissal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.