Case 4117265/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4117265/2018 Mr G Kvasilius v JDT International — 2018
- Case reference
- 4117265/2018
- Decision date
- 18 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4117265/2018 Mr G Kvasilius
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment on the material available because no response had been presented. Employment Judge Robert Gall dealt with the claim on 18 October 2018 and entered judgment the same day.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages. It ordered payment of £1,200, described in the judgment as two weeks' pay due to the claimant but unpaid.
It also found that the claimant's holiday entitlement had not been paid. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,320 in respect of 11 days of holiday accrued but not taken at the date of termination of employment.
Finally, the tribunal ordered payment of £1,200 by reference to a breach of section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, described as a failure to provide a statement of employment particulars. The judgment does not record any other remedy, and the total ordered was £3,720.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,200, described as two weeks' pay due but unpaid. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £1,320 for 11 days of holiday accrued but untaken at termination. | Upheld | — | £1,320 |
| Other | The tribunal made an award of £1,200, described as two weeks' pay, for breach of section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 and failure to provide a statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,720
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.