Case 4117397/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S McGregor v North Lanarkshire Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 4117397/2014
- Decision date
- 28 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S McGregor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal recorded that on 22 December 2020 the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons by 12 January 2021, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing category identifies Unlawful Deduction from Wages, but the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out and does not set out the underlying factual allegations. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing category identifies Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out and does not set out the underlying factual allegations. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.