Case 4118198/2018 · Employment Tribunal
A Kemp (sitting alone) Mr M Bocian v Represented by Ms M Dabrowska Representative Millers of Speyside Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4118198/2018
- Decision date
- 1 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Kemp (sitting alone) Mr M Bocian
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on jurisdiction and time limits, not a merits hearing. Mr M Bocian brought claims for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and holiday pay. The tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 31 March 2018, when he received the dismissal letter stating that the dismissal was with immediate effect. He had already appealed the dismissal on 3 April 2018, and the appeal was heard on 16 May 2018.
Applying the statutory time-limit provisions and the 'not reasonably practicable' test, the tribunal held that the claimant had shown it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the primary period ending on 30 June 2018. The judge accepted that the claimant had very limited English, required interpreters, had tried to obtain legal advice but could not afford representation, and had understood from the ACAS contact reported to him by Ms Dabrowska that he should wait for the written appeal outcome. The judge also accepted that the claimant had not received the appeal outcome letter dated 17 May 2018 and had followed it up by email on 31 May 2018.
Taking those matters together, and noting that early conciliation began on 15 August 2018 and the claim was presented on 3 September 2018, the tribunal held that the claim had been brought within a reasonable further period. The tribunal therefore had jurisdiction to consider all three claims and directed that the case proceed to a final hearing. No finding was made on the underlying merits of any claim and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was in time because it was not reasonably practicable to present it within the primary limit, and that early conciliation on 15 August 2018 and the claim on 3 September 2018 were within a reasonable further period. The claim was allowed to proceed to a final hearing; no merits decision was made. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim under regulation 7 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994. The tribunal applied the same timeliness and reasonable-practicability reasoning and held that the claim could proceed to a final hearing; no merits decision was made. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, alternatively section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal applied the same timeliness and reasonable-practicability reasoning and held that the claim could proceed to a final hearing; no merits decision was made. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- section 111 ERA 1996
- section 97 ERA 1996
- Regulation 7 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994
- Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 23 ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable period
- early conciliation
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.