Case 4118274/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4118274/2018 Mr R Duncan v Lochmaben Brewery Company Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4118274/2018
- Decision date
- 24 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4118274/2018 Mr R Duncan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 October 2018, Employment Judge David Hoey issued a Rule 21 judgment after the claim form had been sent to the respondent on 6 September 2018 and no response was lodged within the required time. On the material before the tribunal, the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded.
The judge decided that liability could properly be determined without a hearing, but remedy could not. The judgment states that the remedy for unfair dismissal would be determined at a hearing.
The judgment also records that liability in respect of wages due, notice pay due, and holiday pay due would be considered at the hearing. Those matters were not finally determined in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to enter a response. Liability succeeded; remedy was reserved to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.